Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Student faves

I posted this on my other blog on my birthday in 2009.  I hope you don't mind that I poach from my own work.  I don't think it's plagiarism, if I was the original author.

===============================================

I can think of several films that are named every year as absolute "must see" films by students. Here they are:

1. Requieum for a Dream
2. American History X
3. Fight Club
4. Shawshank Redemption

I liked the last two very much. Both are very professional films made with great skill. The story, script, direction, acting etc. on Fight Club and Shawshank are first rate. I have given my reasons why I thought Shawshank ultimately was disappointing, but that does not mean I disliked it. My feeling is that it could have been more than it was. But, it was good. Fight Club also was very entertaining and thought-provoking.

Now, the first two are less slick. They are both either actual indie films, or at least have the low budget, down and dirty look of the Indie. Hence, they should be judged on a slightly different basis. After all, money should be able to buy a certain level of professionalism.

It's been years since I saw American History X, but I found it to be rather boring, and I did not watch to the end. I thought Ed Norton, or whatever his name is, had way too many long-winded speeches.

Now, on to Requieum for a Dream. I liked the first half hour very much. I thought the acting, pacing, quirky effects, overall theme, were all done very well. But I thought the film basically fell apart in the last half because it became a melodrama. Melodrama refers to overly sensational plot driven vehicles, where character development is sacrificed to plot. All sorts of horrible things occur because the director decrees that it be so. When Will Munny kills Little Bill in Unforgiven, it is becuase he must do so based upon our intimate understanding of his character. No other action is possible. But when the main character in RfaD injects himself directly into a disgusting festering abscess in his arm, we ask ourselves, "don't you have another arm?"

Thus, a good film descends into melodrama, and fails to convince.

However, I know how difficult it is to make a good movie, and I give it a lot of points for effort. An example is the special effect the director uses to show us the experience of getting high on heroin. A close-up of an eyeball with the iris contracting with psychedelic visions in the background is very clever and unique when we see it the first time. After it is shown the 23rd time, it becomes tiresome. One might argue that that is the point. Heroin addicts have to shoot up constantly. That must be awfully repetitive and tiresome also. My point here is that I thought the director tried something pretty cool, but failed in the end.

But why does this film appeal to 17 year olds so strongly, while it left this 42 year old unmoved? The answer, of course, is that I see things clearly and you youngsters are blind, but you do outnumber me, thus I will entertain the (absurdly remote) possibility that I have missed something.

I'm rambling here a bit, but it's late and I'll go on. Years ago, I used to watch Siskel and Ebert, and I found that if they both raved about a film, it was a good bet. If only one of them went for it, I stayed away. The same may be true with us. I know we're all way up there in the IQ department. But the age differnce is a big gulf. So, if we both really rave about a film, you can bet on it being great.

After class today, Nick stayed behind for a few minutes and commented on how much he liked Unforgiven. His comments echoed my own sentiments to a tee. The subtlety with which Will Munny starts sipping at the whisky bottle. Another director would have had him announce portentously, "Hand me that bottle, Kid." He would have taken an enormous draught as a dramatic musical cresscendo erupted in the background. The other day in class, I mentioned that film analysis is as much about seeing what is NOT present as it is in seeing what is. Nick saw what didn't happen. Anyway, the meeting of the minds between the 17 year old and the 38 year old was gratifying and satisfying. I hope the rest of you enjoyed Unforgiven as much. I'd like to hear your thoughts on it, if you get a chance to write this weekend.

Our next film is one that students almost universally hate.... and I absolutely love. Every year the class tells me that this film is their least favorite. And every year I tell them that they are a bunch of ignorant bozo's who should never have been allowed to leave the circus sideshow.. But this year will be different. You people are not savages. YOu will recognize the greatness of "The Asphalt Jungle."

Oh, apropos of nothing at all, today is my birthday. I was born on April 24th, 1975.

4 comments:

  1. I definitely agree on fight club, its one of my all time favorite movies. I have never seen requiem for a dream, but in my opinion Ed Norton plays his role tremendously in Fight Club. I will say though that Brad Pitt was definitely the better character in the movie

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, look at me making an appearance in class again haha.

    I've seen Requiem for a Dream since our class and I must say, I hated it. My main problem with it was the fact that I felt nothing for the characters (with the exception of the mother, who had a truly tragic storyline). Seeing 3 good looking, young people (Jennifer Connelly, Jared Leto, and that Wayans guy) knowingly ruin their lives just caused me to despise them. I feel no sympathy for drug addicts, especially those who bring it on themselves, like the characters in this film. If a movie is going to make me hate the characters, it better at least be entertaining to save itself. I wasn't entertained and I didn't learn anything new.

    I still disagree about American History X. I felt Norton's speeches were necessary to show how influential he was in the community. The ending is very powerful and I recommend you try and watch it again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, I loved the Asphalt Jungle. I hope your new class can see the brilliance behind it as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm with Nick's second comment here. At the end of the year, I voted the Asphalt Jungle to be the best film of the year in a close contest. I hope this class will also feel the same connection to this film and enjoy it as much as our class did, which I know was quite rare.

    ReplyDelete